lookibicycle.blogg.se

Sonority difference clusters
Sonority difference clusters






sonority difference clusters

Relational properties as perceptual correlates of phonetic features. 2000, PhD dissertation, Cornell University ), continuity of the spectrum amplitude (Stevens, 1987 Stevens K. Phonological patterns and phonetic manifestations of consonant weakening. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1990 283– 333 Lavoie, 2000 Lavoie L. Papers in laboratory phonology I: between grammar and physics of speech, J Kingston, M Beckman. The role of sonority cycle in core syllabification. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1984 107– 136 Clements, 1990 Clements G. Language sound structure: studies in phonology presented to Morris Halle by his teacher and students, M Aranoff, R. On the major class features and syllable theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2001 ), loudness (Selkirk, 1984 Selkirk E. Phonetic bases of markedness, B Hayes, R Kirchner, D Steriade. Perceptual cue robustness and phonotactic constraints: rethinking sonority. Basil Blackwell, Cambridge 1990 Wright, 2001 Wright R. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1988 281– 302 Goldsmith, 1990 Goldsmith J. Volume I: linguistic theory: foundations, F. University of Leeds, Leeds 1998 68– 80 ), acoustic energy (Keating, 1988 Keating P. Working papers in linguistics and phonetics 6, P Foulkes. An unusual kind of sonority and its implications for phonetic theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1977 Heselwood, 1998 Heselwood B. Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, IL 1979 43– 51 ), resonance (Foley, 1977 Foley J. The elements: a parasession on linguistic units and levels, P. Segmental strength hierarchies in phonological theory. Blackwell, Oxford 1994 Brakel, 1979 Brakel A. Harper & Row, New York 1968 Kenstowicz, 1994 Kenstowicz M. Longman, London 1990 ), propensity for spontaneous voicing (Chomsky & Halle, 1968 Chomsky N., Halle M. Longman, London 1989 Durand, 1990 Durand J. Cambridge University Press, New York 1984 Katamba 1989 Katamba F. Phonology: an introduction to basic concepts. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1983 Lass, 1984 Lass R. The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 1978, Doctoral Dissertation Published in 1985 (New York: Garland) Halle & Clements, 1983 Halle M., Clements G. Carl Winter's Universitatbuchhandlung, Heidelberg 1922 Donegan, 1978 Donegan P. A modern English grammar on historical principles, part I: sounds and spellings. Among these are openness of the vocal tract (Jespersen, 1922 Jespersen O. This cross‐linguistic description of patterns of s‐clusters increases our knowledge of typical phonological development and helps selecting targets in clinical context.ġ. Patterns in cluster reductions were, in general, supportive of the factorial typology of Pater and Barlow, while pointing at some difficulties for the predictions of the headedness approach advanced by Goad and Rose, and Jongstra. While all four languages showed similar behaviour in reduction patterns, clear differences between the three Germanic languages–English, Dutch, and Norwegian–and Hebrew were found in the accuracy rate of #sC clusters that have a larger sonority distance between C1 and C2, in a binary split of /s/+ versus /s/+, and in #sC clusters versus non‐/s/‐clusters. In all four languages, a great deal of variability occurred both within and across children, but a number of general patterns were noted. Data from individual studies on English, Dutch, Norwegian, and Hebrew are compared for accuracy of production as well as the reductions with respect to potential differences across subtypes of #sC groups. This paper examines the findings and implications of the cross‐linguistic acquisition of #sC clusters in relation to sonority patterns.








Sonority difference clusters